Vote Status & Likelihood of Passage
Published 7/26/2026, 4:33:07 AM
The governance vote for the deployment of Uniswap v4 on the 0G (Zero Gravity) blockchain is currently in its Temperature Check phase and is scheduled to close today, July 26, 2026, at approximately 08:00 UTC. Based on current governance data and community sentiment, the proposal is highly likely to pass, though it faces minor pushback regarding long-term revenue sharing and governance accountability.
Vote Status & Likelihood of Passage
The proposal, submitted by GFX Labs, is part of a broader "Four for V4" multi-chain expansion strategy. As of the latest update, the vote is active with significant momentum.
| Metric | Status / Value |
|---|---|
| Current Phase | Temperature Check (Phase 2) |
| Closing Date | July 26, 2026 (Today) |
| Quorum Requirement | 10 million UNI "Yes" votes |
| Current Support | ~93% approval (13.9M UNI For vs 1M Against) |
| Cost to DAO | $0 (GFX Labs is covering all deployment and maintenance costs) |
Likelihood Assessment: High. The zero-cost nature of the proposal to the Uniswap DAO is a major catalyst for approval. Historically, similar v4 expansion votes have passed with overwhelming majorities when costs are externalized to the proposer [Source: https://app.uniswap.org/governance].
Community Sentiment & Pushback
While the overall sentiment is positive, specific segments of the community have raised concerns that could influence the final on-chain vote or future implementation details.
- Supportive Sentiment:
- Strategic Alignment: Proposers emphasize 0G's role as an AI-focused modular blockchain, positioning Uniswap v4 to capture institutional DeFi and AI-related trading volume [Source: https://x.com/mlt65/status/1956625319734976762].
- Ecosystem Growth: Major delegates have expressed support for expanding the v4 hook ecosystem to maintain Uniswap's market dominance [Source: https://app.uniswap.org/governance].
- Points of Pushback:
- Revenue Sharing: Some community members have argued that hook developers on new chains could bypass protocol fees. There are calls for legally binding agreements to ensure the DAO retains a revenue share from these deployments [Source: https://app.uniswap.org/governance].
- Governance Fatigue: There is noted "fatigue" regarding large funding requests, leading some delegates to be more critical of all new proposals, even zero-cost ones [Source: https://app.uniswap.org/governance].
- Accountability: Requests have been made to postpone certain operational funding until a concrete "Fee Switch" roadmap is finalized.
Conclusion
The 0G deployment is expected to clear the Temperature Check today, having already surpassed the 10M UNI quorum threshold in preliminary support. The primary risk is not the rejection of the 0G chain itself, but rather the potential for future amendments requiring more stringent revenue-sharing terms for v4 hooks before the final on-chain execution.
Note on 0G Technical Claims: While social sentiment highlights 0G as an "AI-native modular L1" capable of high throughput, specific performance metrics like "100k TPS" are currently based on social media claims and have not been independently verified in official governance documentation [Source: https://x.com/mlt65/status/1956625319734976762].